Search results

case OP_BUY: if( Bid - OrderOpenPrice() + commissionPoints > Trailing * Point ){ if( OrderStopLoss() == 0.0 || Bid - OrderStopLoss() > Trailing * Point ) if( NormalizeDouble( Bid - ( Trailing * Point ), Digits ) != OrderStopLoss() ) r = OrderModify( OrderTicket(), OrderOpenPrice()...

I mean with which input values to the indicator?

Hi Nexus6, what are linear regression filter settings?

any results from testing ?

result.retcode=OrderSendAsync(request,result); trying to make use of this .

working on mq5 . lets see how it works

It will work in Backtesting and Demo accounts. But in with real MT4 account it will not work. the only alternative option is to opt MT5 . the ea should give profit in MT5 with "Every Tick based on real ticks" with 99% modeling quality in back test.

my honest answer to your question in your email is don't trade with forex unless you get confirmed with real account results with very little amount of money deposit for at least 1 month. Back testing with 100% quality tick data, forward testing with Demo with any percent of quality are useless...

yes

please any one test this EA in VPS with low latency.

I need a real/live MT5 account with small deposit 20-50 dollar . that's it.

ex5 version

No VPS 276 ms latency with PC

Tradersway MT5 Demo Login: 1022848 Investor: di6aohgw

I did not test 701 in mt4

Hi Team, if any one open an account with Tradersway with $50 deposit under MT5, I will run the account for him/her. Share the acc no/master pwd with [email protected]. thanks,

Hi Trevor, I got admired with your most intelligent logic of below little piece of your code and you shared. void manageTicks(). initially I thought of making use of RExecuteAsync() function which is part of R for Asynchronous execution of the orders. But in practical, its not yielding any...

with above changes we are getting the results as above with spread=50:speechless:

Hi Trevor, if we run the ea for xauusd, it is saying "Notice: Not enough free margin to open trade. Expert is removed." even though we have sufficient margin. can we run by suppressing this margin check condition? please advise