Search results

Everything is explained in the first post - read carefully. You will lose your money if you start with only 1000$.

It is funny that mostly the ones who are too lazy to look for their answers themselves are exactly the ones who are too poor for beeing successful in this business. Correlation at its best.

Way too short timeframe. This is a LONGTERM strategy. Some trades will be open for months. You guys seem to underestimate this horribly. It is not like getting a clear picture in some days or weeks. You can do it of course, but then it is no real help. If you look for giving a serious picture...

In fact not even that. Tests are needed only technical wise - like analysing potential error codes occuring or unexplainable trade opening/closing to ensure a smooth and reliable trading experience. What you most likely mean is improving the performance by further tests. That is NOT necessary...

Then just stop using it and lose your money with bullshit bots instead! There is NO money NO, it is not allowed. People like you are not allowed to demand ANYTHING. Did you create anything useful?!? You are using genious code for FREE and hate about it. You simply did not understand how...

It is simply the short timeframe. I can confirm the bad results until now on my 10k live account starting from early June. But since the EA manages trades up to one full year we are still far from a reliable judgement. A friend of mine started end of July and got much better results until now...

This post is representative for most of the contributors here: unrealistic expectations! (besides the fact that he is using crap data to perform a backtest) I mean, there is even a plus in your report. Greed is the only problem here. In fact there are several pairs not gaining until now in...

Wrong.

Do the math: Which part of 1000$ per pair(!) did you miss? Even if he got 3000$ it would not be enough. I am running ALL 10 pairs LIVE on a 10k account (in words TENTHOUSAND) and can tell you, that the drawdown will accumulate over time until it reaches its regular value range after 1-3 month...

You will lose ALL YOUR MONEY! Why? It was said mutliple times, that you need at least 500-1000$ per pair and 0.01 lotsize. What are you doing? Using only ridiculous 600$ for several pairs and 0.02. Fail! You will lose your money and blame the EA for it aftwerwards. The problem mostly is not the...

What a stupid moron you are! Your renamed ATP even shows "Autotrading Portfolio" as author, which is hardcoded, which is why you cannot change it. It is people like YOU who makes it hard for people with good intentions to share something that works for free. Just go and loose you demomoney...

Next irritating post from you! Please stop posting until you understood how the EA works. You cannot influence or set the full magic number for any of the ATP EAs - the different strategies are hardcoded within each, there is no external variable to set the full magic number. The magic number...

Sorry to sound rude, but the "error" sits in front of the computer technically every time. Investigate closely before yelling! Trades opened at the same time does not necessarily mean they are identical - just check the magicnumber! They are different. Errors are listed in the journal, logfile...

This not not EA VRA2 - it is renamed AutoProfit 3.0!

Backtest wonder, a spread of 2 points is far from real conditions. You can not use the min spread a broker reaches under perfect liquidity situations. For EURUSD a backtest with 15-20 points is representing real conditions including average slippage (on good brokers). If your backtest is only...

Do not ever use backtests with spread of 0.2 pips = 2 points! It is far from what you will see under live conditions and gives false impressions only.